Sunday, 17 January 2016

Barriers to the Effective Use of the Technology in Education

In order to analyze possible barriers to effective use of the technology in education, it can be a good idea to consider the issue in two tiers, i.e. Teaching and Learning. The teaching is what is delivered by a teacher and learning is that is to take place at the end of students. So the barrier could be falling in the remit of any of these two spheres in terms of responsibility. A constraint in any of the two spheres can play a role of learning not taking place, and thus, teaching not taking place in deed.



Teacher Responsibility Sphere

An example from my Micro-Teach lesson is used to explain this sphere. When Micro-Teach lessons were being delivered, I was listening to them in a student capacity. There was a glare on the projector screen because of the unnecessary lights being on. All of us in student capacity were shy to request to turn the lights off to avoid the glare, causing uncomfortability and distraction. However, when I was up to deliver my Micro-Teach lesson, the first thing I did was to turn those extra lights off. This was appreciated by all the audience (who were there in the student capacity as a role play). The point is that it was the teacher’s (Micro-Teach lesson deliverer in this case) responsibility to make sure there are no distractions on behalf of the teacher responsibility. Such little matters can make huge difference to remove barriers and bong the teaching with learning more productively. It can be good idea ask students if everything is alright or they can hear me fine, etc.


Student Responsibility Sphere

Similarly there are distractions that fall in the responsibility remit of students e.g. using mobile phone and social media for their personal use in the classroom. However, social media such as Facebook can be employed in educational context. For instance, when I was at the University of Exeter, I co-supervised a mini-project in which Facebook was chosen as a medium of updating all group members of each other’s progress to communicate between the student group members and supervisors including me. Similarly, mobile phones can be used in the classroom setting in a number of ways, e.g. to engage students in a poll with software like Nearpod. However, I need to master this art yet, which itself can be deemed as a barrier, that is lack of time and staff training and development on how to effectively use the ICT technology in classroom and other teaching-learning settings.


General Idea

Based on above paragraphs, the following point can be made: Although the technology has brought about new and innovative opportunities to boost styles of learning, student-oriented education and deeper level stimulation of thinking; the teachers’ mind-sets and traditional beliefs may impede them to uptake and usefully apply the technology with their course designs and syllabus to its full potential. I personally believe the main hurdle simply is the lack of the understanding of the concept of the technology and the social media.


General Examples of Barriers

A few examples of barriers are listed below (but not explored further due to brevity of the blog) where these barriers (or constraints) can be intrinsic or extrinsic depending upon how and where boundaries are drawn (Bingimlas, 2009):

·         E safety (e.g. privacy, hacking, spam, virus, phishing, etc.)
·         Lack of teacher confidence
·         Resistance to change and negative attitudes
·         Lack of teacher competence
·         Lack of effective training
·         Lack of time
·         Lack of technical support
·         Culture
·         Disability / Special Education Needs
·         Language
·         Cost
·         Lack of motivation
·         Access to facilities
·         Prior knowledge (lacking or inappropriate)
·         Numerical skills lacking
·         Etc.


Reference


Bingimlas, K.A., 2009. Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(3), pp.235-245.

No comments:

Post a Comment